S v Secretary of State for the Home Department

S v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The immigration judge's structuring of the decision, by considering medical evidence only after reaching adverse credibility findings, created at least the appearance that the evidence could not affect the outcome. This was a structural error, giving the applicant a real prospect of success on appeal.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: S; Defendant/respondent: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (asylum/immigration) / Permission to Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Assessment of Credibility, Medical Evidence in Asylum Claims, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S

Claimant/appellant

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (asylum/immigration) / Permission to Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the immigration judge erred in law by failing to integrate medical evidence into the assessment of credibility
  2. 2 Whether the structure of the decision rendered the medical evidence ineffective in influencing the credibility findings
  3. 3 Whether the point raised for the first time in the Court of Appeal could be entertained

Ratio Decidendi

The immigration judge's structuring of the decision, by considering medical evidence only after reaching adverse credibility findings, created at least the appearance that the evidence could not affect the outcome. This was a structural error, giving the applicant a real prospect of success on appeal.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted

Orders

  • Application allowed