Brown v Ministry of Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 546 (10 May 2006)
The correct approach to assessing damages for loss of pension rights is to evaluate the probabilities of the claimant completing key service periods (6, 12, and 22 years) and to award damages proportionately, rather than assuming full service on the balance of probabilities. The chance of promotion to higher rank should be factored in only if supported by evidence. Damages for disadvantage in the labour market should be awarded only if there is a more than insignificant risk of future disadvantage, and the quantum should reflect the likely degree of disadvantage.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 546
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Jennifer Anne Brown; Defendant/appellant: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Loss of Pension Rights, Disadvantage in the Labour Market, Loss of Congenial Employment, Causation, Future Loss Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jennifer Anne Brown
Claimant/respondent
Ministry of Defence
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct method for assessing damages for loss of pension rights where future service is uncertain?
- 2 Should damages for disadvantage in the labour market be awarded and, if so, in what amount?
- 3 How should the chance of promotion be factored into damages?
Ratio Decidendi
The correct approach to assessing damages for loss of pension rights is to evaluate the probabilities of the claimant completing key service periods (6, 12, and 22 years) and to award damages proportionately, rather than assuming full service on the balance of probabilities. The chance of promotion to higher rank should be factored in only if supported by evidence. Damages for disadvantage in the labour market should be awarded only if there is a more than insignificant risk of future disadvantage, and the quantum should reflect the likely degree of disadvantage.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Damages for loss of pension rights to be recalculated based on a 30% chance of completing 22 years' service, 50% chance of completing 12 years, and 100% chance of completing 6 years, with appropriate adjustments for rank and a 15% chance of promotion to WO1.
- Award for disadvantage in the labour market restored but reduced to £5,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment