Irani v Duchon [2019] EWCA Civ 1846 (06 November 2019)
The trial judge was entitled to reject the multiplier/multiplicand approach for future loss of earnings due to insufficient and unreliable evidence regarding residual earnings in India and uncertainty about the claimant's future. The judge was not bound to accept the claimant's unchallenged evidence as it was opinion, not probative fact. The judge correctly found that the accident was an operative cause of redundancy and loss of indefinite leave to remain, applying the correct test of causation.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Civ 1846
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Mr Khuzan Irani; Respondent/defendant: Mr Oscar Duchon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Future Loss of Earnings, Causation, Evidentiary Standards, Redundancy and Immigration Consequences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Khuzan Irani
Appellant/claimant
Mr Oscar Duchon
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in awarding damages for future loss of earnings by way of a Blamire lump sum and Smith v Manchester award instead of the multiplier/multiplicand approach
- 2 Whether the judge was bound to accept the claimant's unchallenged evidence on residual earning capacity
- 3 Whether the judge applied the correct test of causation regarding redundancy and loss of indefinite leave to remain
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to reject the multiplier/multiplicand approach for future loss of earnings due to insufficient and unreliable evidence regarding residual earnings in India and uncertainty about the claimant's future. The judge was not bound to accept the claimant's unchallenged evidence as it was opinion, not probative fact. The judge correctly found that the accident was an operative cause of redundancy and loss of indefinite leave to remain, applying the correct test of causation.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Damages award of £406,688 stands
- No adjustment to damages for future loss of earnings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment