Isbilen vTurk & Ors [2021] EWHC 854 (Ch) (09 April 2021)

Isbilen vTurk & Ors [2021] EWHC 854 (Ch) (09 April 2021)

The court declined to issue a summons under CPR 81.6 for contempt proceedings, finding that Mr Turk's failures were not deliberate or wilful, and that the circumstances did not warrant such proceedings in accordance with the overriding objective and proportionality. Cross-examination was ordered by consent with safeguards, but contempt proceedings were not justified.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 854 (Ch)
Parties
Applicant / Claimant: Nebahat Evyap İşbilen; First Respondent / First Defendant: Selman Turk; Second Respondent / Second Defendant: SG Financial Group Limited; Third Respondent / Third Defendant: Barton Group Holdings Limited; Fourth Respondent / Fourth Defendant: Sentinel Global Asset Management, Inc; Fifth Respondent / Fifth Defendant: Sentinel Global Partners Limited; Sixth Respondent / Sixth Defendant: AET Global DMCC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 April 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Claim / Interlocutory Hearing on Continuation of Ex Parte Orders and Applications for Cross Examination and Contempt
Outcome
Continuation of ex parte orders with adjustments; cross-examination of Mr Turk ordered by consent; no contempt proceedings initiated under CPR 81.6.
Legal Topics
Asset Freezing Orders, Disclosure Obligations, Fiduciary Duties, Contempt of Court, Cross Examination, Proprietary Injunctions
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Asset Freezing Orders Disclosure Obligations Fiduciary Duties Contempt of Court Cross Examination Proprietary Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nebahat Evyap İşbilen

Applicant / Claimant

Selman Turk

First Respondent / First Defendant

SG Financial Group Limited

Second Respondent / Second Defendant

Barton Group Holdings Limited

Third Respondent / Third Defendant

Sentinel Global Asset Management, Inc

Fourth Respondent / Fourth Defendant

Sentinel Global Partners Limited

Fifth Respondent / Fifth Defendant

AET Global DMCC

Sixth Respondent / Sixth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Civil Claim / Interlocutory Hearing on Continuation of Ex Parte Orders and Applications for Cross Examination and Contempt

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Turk breached fiduciary duties owed to Mrs İşbilen
  2. 2 Whether Mr Turk committed contempt by failing to comply with disclosure obligations under the Ex Parte Order
  3. 3 Whether cross-examination of Mr Turk should be ordered

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to issue a summons under CPR 81.6 for contempt proceedings, finding that Mr Turk's failures were not deliberate or wilful, and that the circumstances did not warrant such proceedings in accordance with the overriding objective and proportionality. Cross-examination was ordered by consent with safeguards, but contempt proceedings were not justified.

Court Disposition

Continuation of ex parte orders with adjustments; cross-examination of Mr Turk ordered by consent; no contempt proceedings initiated under CPR 81.6.

Orders

  • Continuation of World Wide Freezing Order and Proprietary Injunction with adjustments to preserve jurisdictional challenge.
  • Cross-examination of Mr Turk ordered with advance notice of topics and safeguards on scope and use of evidence.