UK Leasing Brighton Ltd & Ors v Topland Neptune Ltd & Anor
A direct re-assignment from T2 to T1 with a fresh guarantee by G is valid under the 1995 Act, as the statutory releases operate but do not prevent G from entering into a new guarantee upon T1's re-assignment. Such a transaction does not frustrate the operation of the Act, and declaratory relief is granted to permit this structure.
- Parties
- Claimant (second Action): UK Leasing Brighton Limited; Claimant (second Action): Splendid Property Company Limited; Claimant (second Action): Hilton Worldwide Inc; Defendant (second Action): Topland Neptune Limited; Defendant (second Action): Lynn Karen Bush; Claimants (first Action): Zinc Cobham 1 Limited and 21 Others; Defendants (first Action): Adda Hotels and 11 Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Judgment on Declaratory Relief Regarding Lease Assignment and Guarantee Under the Landlord and Tenant (covenants) Act 1995
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Lease, Guarantees, Landlord and Tenant (covenants) Act 1995, Authorised Guarantee Agreements (aga), Release of Liability, Section 24 and Section 25 of the 1995 Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UK Leasing Brighton Limited
Claimant (second Action)
Splendid Property Company Limited
Claimant (second Action)
Hilton Worldwide Inc
Claimant (second Action)
Topland Neptune Limited
Defendant (second Action)
Lynn Karen Bush
Defendant (second Action)
Zinc Cobham 1 Limited and 21 Others
Claimants (first Action)
Adda Hotels and 11 Others
Defendants (first Action)
Procedural Posture
Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Judgment on Declaratory Relief Regarding Lease Assignment and Guarantee Under the Landlord and Tenant (covenants) Act 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a direct re-assignment of a lease from T2 to T1 with a fresh guarantee by G is valid under the 1995 Act
- 2 Whether an agreement to effect a series of assignments (via Newco) with a fresh guarantee by G is valid under the 1995 Act
- 3 Whether such agreements or guarantees are void as frustrating the operation of the 1995 Act, particularly section 24(2) and section 25
Ratio Decidendi
A direct re-assignment from T2 to T1 with a fresh guarantee by G is valid under the 1995 Act, as the statutory releases operate but do not prevent G from entering into a new guarantee upon T1's re-assignment. Such a transaction does not frustrate the operation of the Act, and declaratory relief is granted to permit this structure.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted
Orders
- It is declared that a direct re-assignment by T2 to T1 with a fresh guarantee by G is valid under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment