George Kounis v Critchlow and Associates Limited

George Kounis v Critchlow and Associates Limited

No concluded agreement to extend the assignment deadline was reached on 15 May 2023; therefore, the cause of action vested in Amtrust, and the Claimant lacked standing to sue alone. The Master erred in finding otherwise. The subsequent October 2023 correspondence did not amount to a variation or create a binding estoppel that would allow the claim to proceed without joining Amtrust. The proper order is to allow the Claimant time to apply to join Amtrust as a party, failing which the claim will be struck out.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: George Kounis; Defendant/appellant: Critchlow and Associates Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Dismissing Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Assignment of Causes of Action, Standing to Sue, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Estoppel, Variation of Contract
Civil Procedure Contract Law Equity Assignment of Causes of Action Standing to Sue Summary Judgment Strike Out Applications Estoppel +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Kounis

Claimant/respondent

Critchlow and Associates Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Dismissing Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a concluded agreement to extend the assignment deadline was reached on 15 May 2023
  2. 2 Whether the claimant had standing to bring the claim or whether the cause of action vested in Amtrust
  3. 3 Whether subsequent correspondence in October 2023 affected the assignment or created an estoppel or variation

Ratio Decidendi

No concluded agreement to extend the assignment deadline was reached on 15 May 2023; therefore, the cause of action vested in Amtrust, and the Claimant lacked standing to sue alone. The Master erred in finding otherwise. The subsequent October 2023 correspondence did not amount to a variation or create a binding estoppel that would allow the claim to proceed without joining Amtrust. The proper order is to allow the Claimant time to apply to join Amtrust as a party, failing which the claim will be struck out.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Claimant to have a set period to apply to join Amtrust as a party; if not, claim to be struck out
  • Parties to draw up a suitable order