Promontoria (Oak) Ltd v Emanuel & Anor
The application to admit new evidence fails because the evidence would not have had an important influence on the result and is not required for the grounds of appeal. The application to introduce a new ground of appeal alleging fraud is refused because such allegations must be pursued in a separate action, not on appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Promontoria (Oak) Limited; Defendant/appellant: Nicholas Michael Emanuel; Defendant/appellant: Nicola Jane Emanuel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Admit New Evidence and Amend Grounds of Appeal
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Debts, Admissibility of Evidence, Appeal Procedure, Fraud in Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Promontoria (Oak) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Nicholas Michael Emanuel
Defendant/appellant
Nicola Jane Emanuel
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Admit New Evidence and Amend Grounds of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether new evidence should be admitted on appeal under Ladd v Marshall principles
- 2 Whether an additional ground of appeal alleging fraud should be allowed
- 3 Whether the Recorder erred in admitting redacted assignment deed as evidence of title
Ratio Decidendi
The application to admit new evidence fails because the evidence would not have had an important influence on the result and is not required for the grounds of appeal. The application to introduce a new ground of appeal alleging fraud is refused because such allegations must be pursued in a separate action, not on appeal.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Application to admit new evidence refused
- Application to amend grounds of appeal to add fraud ground refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment