Conway, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 1431 (27 June 2018)
Section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 is compatible with Article 8 ECHR. The prohibition pursues legitimate aims, is rationally connected to those aims, and is necessary and proportionate. The court must accord significant weight to Parliament's assessment in this area of contested social and moral policy, and the evidence does not demonstrate that the proposed alternative scheme would adequately protect the vulnerable. The appeal is dismissed and no declaration of incompatibility is made.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 1431
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Noel Conway; Respondent/defendant: Secretary of State for Justice; Intervener: Humanists UK; Intervener: Not Dead Yet (UK); Intervener: CNK Alliance Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (human Rights Act Declaration of Incompatibility) / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assisted Suicide, Article 8 ECHR (right to Private Life), Section 2(1) Suicide Act 1961, Proportionality, Margin of Appreciation, Parliamentary Sovereignty, Judicial Deference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Noel Conway
Appellant/claimant
Secretary of State for Justice
Respondent/defendant
Humanists UK
Intervener
Not Dead Yet (UK)
Intervener
CNK Alliance Ltd
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (human Rights Act Declaration of Incompatibility) / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 is a disproportionate interference with Article 8 ECHR rights
- 2 Whether a declaration of incompatibility should be made under section 4 Human Rights Act 1998
- 3 Whether the court should defer to Parliament's assessment on assisted suicide
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 is compatible with Article 8 ECHR. The prohibition pursues legitimate aims, is rationally connected to those aims, and is necessary and proportionate. The court must accord significant weight to Parliament's assessment in this area of contested social and moral policy, and the evidence does not demonstrate that the proposed alternative scheme would adequately protect the vulnerable. The appeal is dismissed and no declaration of incompatibility is made.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No declaration of incompatibility under section 4 Human Rights Act 1998
- Section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961 remains in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment