Secretary Of State For Home Department v Kawesa [2001] EWCA Civ 583 (16 March 2001)
The tribunal was entitled to review and overturn the special adjudicator's findings of fact and credibility where those findings were flawed and unsupported by the evidence; there was no reasonable likelihood of persecution for a Convention reason established by the applicant.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 583
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Defendant/appellant: Patrick Kawesa
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Standard of Proof, Persecution for Convention Reasons, Appellate Review of Fact Finding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Claimant/respondent
Patrick Kawesa
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to the Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in overturning the special adjudicator's findings of fact and credibility
- 2 Whether the applicant established a well-founded fear of persecution for a Convention reason
- 3 Whether the tribunal misapplied the standard of proof or the test for appellate intervention in fact-finding
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal was entitled to review and overturn the special adjudicator's findings of fact and credibility where those findings were flawed and unsupported by the evidence; there was no reasonable likelihood of persecution for a Convention reason established by the applicant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Extension of time granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment