Trunca, R (on the application of) v Secretary Of State For the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 1702 (7 November 2001)
The special adjudicator acted within his discretion in refusing a further adjournment due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the applicant's fitness to attend the hearing; the judicial review judge was correct in finding no legal flaw in that decision.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1702
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Gintaras Trunca; Defendant/respondent: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (immigration/asylum) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Adjournment of Hearings, Judicial Discretion, Medical Evidence in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gintaras Trunca
Claimant/applicant
The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (immigration/asylum) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the special adjudicator erred in refusing a further adjournment of the asylum appeal hearing on medical grounds
- 2 Whether the judicial review judge erred in upholding the adjudicator's decision
Ratio Decidendi
The special adjudicator acted within his discretion in refusing a further adjournment due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the applicant's fitness to attend the hearing; the judicial review judge was correct in finding no legal flaw in that decision.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application refused
- Public funding assessment of the applicant's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment