Brati v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1092 (19 July 2002)

Brati v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1092 (19 July 2002)

Permission to appeal is granted because there is an arguable case that the Immigration Appeal Tribunal failed to consider the merits of the adjudicator's reasoning, potentially resulting in procedural unfairness.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1092
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Rifat Brati; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Asylum, Appeal Procedure, Findings of Fact, Procedural Fairness
Immigration Law Administrative Law Asylum Appeal Procedure Findings of Fact Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rifat Brati

Claimant/applicant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal without considering the merits of the adjudicator's reasoning
  2. 2 Whether procedural unfairness occurred due to the handling of leave to appeal and the Tribunal's approach

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted because there is an arguable case that the Immigration Appeal Tribunal failed to consider the merits of the adjudicator's reasoning, potentially resulting in procedural unfairness.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted

Orders

  • Application allowed with a time estimate of half a day, to be listed in the short warned list before two Lords Justices.