Bashir v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 696 (19 May 2004)

Bashir v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 696 (19 May 2004)

The tribunal was justified in disregarding the new material because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of Rule 21 of the 2003 Rules. There were no exceptional circumstances to warrant admission of the fresh evidence, and the new material would not have affected the outcome given the adjudicator's thorough credibility assessment.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Civ 696
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Amir Mohamed Bashir; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Procedural Fairness, Admission of Fresh Evidence, Credibility Assessment
Immigration Law Human Rights Law Asylum Procedural Fairness Admission of Fresh Evidence Credibility Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amir Mohamed Bashir

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in failing to consider fresh evidence submitted after the adjudicator's hearing
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal's approach to the admission of new evidence under Rule 21 of the 2003 Rules was correct
  3. 3 Whether the adjudicator's findings on credibility and refusal of asylum were justified

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal was justified in disregarding the new material because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of Rule 21 of the 2003 Rules. There were no exceptional circumstances to warrant admission of the fresh evidence, and the new material would not have affected the outcome given the adjudicator's thorough credibility assessment.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Applicant/appellant's costs to be subject to detailed assessment