Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1223 (26 July 2006)

Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1223 (26 July 2006)

The adjudicator did not err in law in his assessment of the appellant's credibility, having considered the account in the context of Iranian conditions and given adequate reasons; Section 8 issues do not affect the outcome as the credibility finding was lawfully made.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Civ 1223
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Y; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Article 3 ECHR, Section 8 Asylum and Immigration (treatment of Claimants, Etc) Act 2004

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Y

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator erred in law in assessing the appellant's credibility in his asylum and human rights claim
  2. 2 Whether Section 8 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, Etc) Act 2004 was correctly applied and compatible with the ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator did not err in law in his assessment of the appellant's credibility, having considered the account in the context of Iranian conditions and given adequate reasons; Section 8 issues do not affect the outcome as the credibility finding was lawfully made.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed