Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1223 (26 July 2006)
The adjudicator did not err in law in his assessment of the appellant's credibility, having considered the account in the context of Iranian conditions and given adequate reasons; Section 8 issues do not affect the outcome as the credibility finding was lawfully made.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1223
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Y; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Article 3 ECHR, Section 8 Asylum and Immigration (treatment of Claimants, Etc) Act 2004
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Y
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator erred in law in assessing the appellant's credibility in his asylum and human rights claim
- 2 Whether Section 8 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, Etc) Act 2004 was correctly applied and compatible with the ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator did not err in law in his assessment of the appellant's credibility, having considered the account in the context of Iranian conditions and given adequate reasons; Section 8 issues do not affect the outcome as the credibility finding was lawfully made.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment