Mouhoub v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the appellant did not establish a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter. Even if there was a difference between the 'real risk' and 'reasonable likelihood' tests, the outcome would have been the same given the tribunal's approach to the evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Khelifa Mohamed Ait Mouhoub; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Deportation, Article 3 ECHR, Standard of Proof in Human Rights Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khelifa Mohamed Ait Mouhoub
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant faces a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter
- 2 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal applied the correct legal test for risk under Article 3 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the appellant did not establish a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter. Even if there was a difference between the 'real risk' and 'reasonable likelihood' tests, the outcome would have been the same given the tribunal's approach to the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment