Mouhoub v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Mouhoub v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the appellant did not establish a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter. Even if there was a difference between the 'real risk' and 'reasonable likelihood' tests, the outcome would have been the same given the tribunal's approach to the evidence.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Khelifa Mohamed Ait Mouhoub; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Deportation, Article 3 ECHR, Standard of Proof in Human Rights Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khelifa Mohamed Ait Mouhoub

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant faces a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter
  2. 2 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal applied the correct legal test for risk under Article 3 ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the appellant did not establish a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if returned to Algeria as a deserter. Even if there was a difference between the 'real risk' and 'reasonable likelihood' tests, the outcome would have been the same given the tribunal's approach to the evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed