Mlauzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Mlauzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings in the absence of an error of law. The Adjudicator's reasoning was adequate and supported by evidence. The appeal is allowed and the Adjudicator's decision restored.

Parties
Appellant/applicant: Sithokozile Mlauzi; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Refugee Status, Internal Relocation, Jurisdiction of Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Article 3 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sithokozile Mlauzi

Appellant/applicant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal had jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings absent an error of law
  2. 2 Whether the Adjudicator's reasoning on internal relocation and risk was adequate
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was at real risk of persecution or Article 3 ECHR violation if returned to Zimbabwe

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings in the absence of an error of law. The Adjudicator's reasoning was adequate and supported by evidence. The appeal is allowed and the Adjudicator's decision restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The decision of the Adjudicator is restored.