Mlauzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings in the absence of an error of law. The Adjudicator's reasoning was adequate and supported by evidence. The appeal is allowed and the Adjudicator's decision restored.
- Parties
- Appellant/applicant: Sithokozile Mlauzi; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Refugee Status, Internal Relocation, Jurisdiction of Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Article 3 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sithokozile Mlauzi
Appellant/applicant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal had jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings absent an error of law
- 2 Whether the Adjudicator's reasoning on internal relocation and risk was adequate
- 3 Whether the appellant was at real risk of persecution or Article 3 ECHR violation if returned to Zimbabwe
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to overturn the Adjudicator's factual findings in the absence of an error of law. The Adjudicator's reasoning was adequate and supported by evidence. The appeal is allowed and the Adjudicator's decision restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The decision of the Adjudicator is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment