Wani, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor
Judicial review of interlocutory decisions by the AIT to reconsider an appeal for error of law is generally an abuse of process and should not be entertained; the proper remedy is by appeal after final determination. The reasons for finding an error of law must be disclosed to the parties, but the claim is dismissed as premature and without merit.
- Parties
- Claimant: R (Wani); First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Defendant: A. I. T.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Judicial Review, Errors of Law, Reconsideration Procedure, Disclosure of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R (Wani)
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
First Defendant
A. I. T.
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judicial review lies against an interlocutory decision of the AIT to reconsider an appeal for error of law
- 2 Whether the reasons for finding an error of law must be disclosed to the parties
- 3 Whether the AIT's practice directions and procedure rules are being properly applied in transitional cases
Ratio Decidendi
Judicial review of interlocutory decisions by the AIT to reconsider an appeal for error of law is generally an abuse of process and should not be entertained; the proper remedy is by appeal after final determination. The reasons for finding an error of law must be disclosed to the parties, but the claim is dismissed as premature and without merit.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
- Detailed assessment order for legal aid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment