A, R (on the application of) v National Asylum Support Service & Anor
The duty to provide 'adequate' accommodation under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 is to prevent destitution and must be assessed in light of the individual needs of the asylum seeker and dependants, including disability. Where the family has accepted accommodation as adequate pending a search for more suitable property, and the authorities are making reasonable efforts to find such accommodation, there is no breach of duty. The local authority's duty is excluded while NASS is acting. Article 8 is engaged but not breached in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Queen (on the application of A); First Defendant/respondent: National Asylum Support Service; Second Defendant/respondent: London Borough of Waltham Forest
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (judicial Review) / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Seekers Support, Adequacy of Accommodation, Disabled Children, Statutory Interpretation, Article 8 ECHR, Local Authority Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen (on the application of A)
Claimant/appellant
National Asylum Support Service
First Defendant/respondent
London Borough of Waltham Forest
Second Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (judicial Review) / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes 'adequate' accommodation for disabled children of asylum seekers under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999?
- 2 Who is responsible for providing such accommodation: the National Asylum Support Service or the local authority?
- 3 Does the duty to provide adequate accommodation differ between disabled children and disabled adults?
Ratio Decidendi
The duty to provide 'adequate' accommodation under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 is to prevent destitution and must be assessed in light of the individual needs of the asylum seeker and dependants, including disability. Where the family has accepted accommodation as adequate pending a search for more suitable property, and the authorities are making reasonable efforts to find such accommodation, there is no breach of duty. The local authority's duty is excluded while NASS is acting. Article 8 is engaged but not breached in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order against NASS or Waltham Forest to provide alternative accommodation at this stage
- Urgent steps must continue to be taken to find more suitable accommodation, but no current breach of duty found
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment