AR (Iran), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 778 (28 June 2013)
Dublin II governs the allocation of responsibility for asylum claims between member states and does not create individual rights for asylum seekers. The Procedures Directive does not apply where Dublin II applies. The UK and Belgium followed the correct Dublin II procedure, and Belgium accepted responsibility. There was no procedural error or duty on the Secretary of State to assist the appellant in producing evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 778
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: AR (Iran); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (administrative Court, Appeal to Court of Appeal) / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Procedure, Dublin II Regulation, Procedures Directive, Allocation of Responsibility for Asylum Claims, Individual Rights Under EU Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AR (Iran)
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (administrative Court, Appeal to Court of Appeal) / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UK was obliged to examine the appellant's asylum claim under Article 6.2 of the Procedures Directive or whether Dublin II applied
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State's decision to transfer the appellant to Belgium was vitiated by procedural errors or a failure to assist the appellant in producing evidence
- 3 Whether Dublin II creates individual rights for asylum seekers
Ratio Decidendi
Dublin II governs the allocation of responsibility for asylum claims between member states and does not create individual rights for asylum seekers. The Procedures Directive does not apply where Dublin II applies. The UK and Belgium followed the correct Dublin II procedure, and Belgium accepted responsibility. There was no procedural error or duty on the Secretary of State to assist the appellant in producing evidence. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No reference to the CJEU will be made.
- The way is clear for the removal of AR to Belgium for substantive consideration of his asylum claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment