Dogan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 1673 (28 October 2003)
Section 103(2) does not provide a right of appeal where support is ended due to breach of a condition imposed at the time of grant; it only applies where support, once granted, is stopped prematurely for reasons other than those originally contemplated.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1673
- Parties
- Appellant/interested Party: Ahmet Dogan; First Respondent/claimant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Second Respondent/defendant: Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) From Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Support, Statutory Interpretation, Appeals Process, Dispersal Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ahmet Dogan
Appellant/interested Party
Secretary of State for the Home Department
First Respondent/claimant
Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator
Second Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) From Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct construction of Section 103(2) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 regarding the right of appeal when support is stopped?
- 2 Does the ending of support for breach of a condition imposed under Section 95 give rise to a right of appeal under Section 103(2)?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 103(2) does not provide a right of appeal where support is ended due to breach of a condition imposed at the time of grant; it only applies where support, once granted, is stopped prematurely for reasons other than those originally contemplated.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No application for costs; appellant's costs subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment