Aviation v Sayegh Group Aviation & Anor

Aviation v Sayegh Group Aviation & Anor

Galaxy Aviation was not party to the lease agreement; neither Sayegh Group Aviation FZE nor Saleem F Sayegh was bound by the lease agreement as Mr Ramadan lacked actual or apparent authority to bind them; no breach of contract was established; and no damages or declaratory relief were warranted.

Parties
Claimant: Galaxy Aviation; First Defendant: Sayegh Group Aviation FZE; Second Defendant: Sameer Saleem Sayegh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Authority of Agents, Breach of Contract, Damages, Interpretation of Contracts, Repudiation, Condition Precedent
Contract Law Agency Law Authority of Agents Breach of Contract Damages Interpretation of Contracts Repudiation Condition Precedent

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Galaxy Aviation

Claimant

Sayegh Group Aviation FZE

First Defendant

Sameer Saleem Sayegh

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was Galaxy Aviation a party to the lease agreement?
  2. 2 Was Sayegh Group Aviation FZE or Saleem F Sayegh a party to the lease agreement?
  3. 3 Did Mr Ramadan have actual or apparent authority to enter into the lease agreement on behalf of the defendants?

Ratio Decidendi

Galaxy Aviation was not party to the lease agreement; neither Sayegh Group Aviation FZE nor Saleem F Sayegh was bound by the lease agreement as Mr Ramadan lacked actual or apparent authority to bind them; no breach of contract was established; and no damages or declaratory relief were warranted.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed