Pattison v Messrs Clarksons & Steele [2001] EWCA Civ 1959 (13 December 2001)
There was no arguable basis for resisting the bankruptcy petition as the debt was due and owing, and the applicant's dissatisfaction with the consequences of bankruptcy does not constitute a ground for appeal. The views expressed by the District Judge after the order were irrelevant to the validity of the bankruptcy order.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1959
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Henry Michael Pattison; Defendant/respondent: Messrs Clarksons & Steele
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Order, Appeals Process, Vesting of Causes of Action in Trustee, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Michael Pattison
Claimant/applicant
Messrs Clarksons & Steele
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted for a second-tier appeal against a bankruptcy order
- 2 Whether the applicant's cause of action against the respondent survives bankruptcy or vests in the trustee
Ratio Decidendi
There was no arguable basis for resisting the bankruptcy petition as the debt was due and owing, and the applicant's dissatisfaction with the consequences of bankruptcy does not constitute a ground for appeal. The views expressed by the District Judge after the order were irrelevant to the validity of the bankruptcy order.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application refused
- Transcript of judgment to be provided at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment