Ciddy Ltd v Natalia [2025] EWHC 1616 (Ch) (04 July 2025)
The Debtor has established a substantial dispute regarding both the unfair relationship under the Consumer Credit Act and the unenforceability of the default interest provision as a penalty clause. Until County Court proceedings determine the actual sum due, there is no liquidated debt for bankruptcy jurisdiction....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 1616 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ciddy Limited; Respondent/debtor: Anjana Natalia
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Petition, Unfair Relationship Under Consumer Credit Act, Penalty Clauses, Default Interest, Loan Enforcement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ciddy Limited
Petitioner
Anjana Natalia
Respondent/debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loan agreement created an unfair relationship under sections 140A-140C Consumer Credit Act 1974
- 2 Whether the default interest provision constitutes an unenforceable penalty clause
- 3 Whether the bankruptcy petition should proceed given disputed debt
Ratio Decidendi
The Debtor has established a substantial dispute regarding both the unfair relationship under the Consumer Credit Act and the unenforceability of the default interest provision as a penalty clause. Until County Court proceedings determine the actual sum due, there is no liquidated debt for bankruptcy jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Bankruptcy petition dismissed
- No bankruptcy order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment