Nicolet v Halim [2005] EWCA Civ 91 (17 January 2005)
The newly discovered documents, which were not available at trial and could have had an important influence on the outcome, justify setting aside the original judgment and ordering a re-trial on all issues before a different judge.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 91
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Denis Nicolet; Defendant/appellant: Suzanne Halim
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment below set aside; re-trial ordered before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Ownership, Trusts of Land, New Evidence on Appeal, Credibility of Witnesses, Loan Versus Compensation, Setting Aside Judgment, Re Trial
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denis Nicolet
Claimant/respondent
Suzanne Halim
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether new evidence should be admitted on appeal
- 2 Whether the claimant held the flat on trust for the defendant
- 3 Whether sums paid to the defendant were loans or compensation
Ratio Decidendi
The newly discovered documents, which were not available at trial and could have had an important influence on the outcome, justify setting aside the original judgment and ordering a re-trial on all issues before a different judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment below set aside; re-trial ordered before a different judge.
Orders
- Judgment below set aside
- Re-trial to take place at Central London County Court before a different judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment