Slater v Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 1506 (22 November 2012)
The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that there was any agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership of the property, nor did she establish detrimental reliance sufficient to create an equity. The judge's findings on credibility and the absence of any such agreement were upheld.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1506
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Yvonne Letitia Slater; Defendant/respondent: Stephen Mark Condappa
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Credibility of Witnesses, Family Property Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yvonne Letitia Slater
Claimant/appellant
Stephen Mark Condappa
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has a beneficial interest in the property at 61 Dongola Road, London, E13
- 2 Whether there was an agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership with the claimant
- 3 Whether the claimant relied to her detriment on any such agreement or assurance
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that there was any agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership of the property, nor did she establish detrimental reliance sufficient to create an equity. The judge's findings on credibility and the absence of any such agreement were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no beneficial interest found for the claimant; permission to add further ground of appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment