Slater v Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 1506 (22 November 2012)

Slater v Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 1506 (22 November 2012)

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that there was any agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership of the property, nor did she establish detrimental reliance sufficient to create an equity. The judge's findings on credibility and the absence of any such agreement were upheld.

Citation
[2012] EWCA Civ 1506
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Yvonne Letitia Slater; Defendant/respondent: Stephen Mark Condappa
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Credibility of Witnesses, Family Property Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvonne Letitia Slater

Claimant/appellant

Stephen Mark Condappa

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the claimant has a beneficial interest in the property at 61 Dongola Road, London, E13
  2. 2 Whether there was an agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership with the claimant
  3. 3 Whether the claimant relied to her detriment on any such agreement or assurance

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that there was any agreement or assurance by the defendant to share beneficial ownership of the property, nor did she establish detrimental reliance sufficient to create an equity. The judge's findings on credibility and the absence of any such agreement were upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no beneficial interest found for the claimant; permission to add further ground of appeal refused