Butt v Butt & Ors [2024] EWHC 3222 (Ch) (12 December 2024)

Butt v Butt & Ors [2024] EWHC 3222 (Ch) (12 December 2024)

The court finds that D3 and D4's financial contributions were investments for shares in the Company, not loans to D1. The beneficial ownership of D1's 50% shareholding is held proportionately for D1, D3, and D4 according to their respective contributions, as evidenced by subsequent conduct, contemporaneous documents, and overall probabilities. C's 50% legal shareholding is unaffected and corresponds to his beneficial interest.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 3222 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Mr Mohammad Usman Butt; First Defendant/part 20 Defendant: Mr Mohammad Zarar Butt; Second Defendant/part 20 Defendant: M&B Properties (Nottingham) Ltd; Third Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Mr Mohammad Imran Butt; Fourth Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Mr Mohammad Urfan Butt
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Business List / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Declaration of beneficial ownership; trust imposed over D1's shares in favour of D1, D3, and D4 according to their contributions.
Legal Topics
Beneficial Ownership, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Joint Venture, Shareholding Dispute, Family Business, Proprietary Estoppel
Trusts Company Law Property Law Beneficial Ownership Resulting Trust Constructive Trust Joint Venture Shareholding Dispute +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Mohammad Usman Butt

Claimant/part 20 Defendant

Mr Mohammad Zarar Butt

First Defendant/part 20 Defendant

M&B Properties (Nottingham) Ltd

Second Defendant/part 20 Defendant

Mr Mohammad Imran Butt

Third Defendant/part 20 Claimant

Mr Mohammad Urfan Butt

Fourth Defendant/part 20 Claimant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Business List / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the shareholding in M&B Properties (Nottingham) Ltd is held beneficially in proportion to the brothers' respective financial contributions
  2. 2 Whether payments by D3 and D4 were loans or investments
  3. 3 Whether a resulting or constructive trust arises over the shares

Ratio Decidendi

The court finds that D3 and D4's financial contributions were investments for shares in the Company, not loans to D1. The beneficial ownership of D1's 50% shareholding is held proportionately for D1, D3, and D4 according to their respective contributions, as evidenced by subsequent conduct, contemporaneous documents, and overall probabilities. C's 50% legal shareholding is unaffected and corresponds to his beneficial interest.

Court Disposition

Declaration of beneficial ownership; trust imposed over D1's shares in favour of D1, D3, and D4 according to their contributions.

Orders

  • D1's 50% shareholding in M&B Properties (Nottingham) Ltd is held on trust for D1, D3, and D4 in proportions of £40,997 (D1), £75,000 (D3), and £65,997 (D4)
  • C's 50% shareholding remains beneficially his