Khan v Mohammed & Anor

Khan v Mohammed & Anor

The property was acquired by the first defendant for the partnership with the claimant, and the first defendant breached fiduciary duties by excluding the claimant. The second defendant's beneficial interest arises from a dishonest arrangement and ranks after the claimant's partnership interest. The property is held in trust for the partnership, and the first defendant's share is held on further trust for the second defendant.

Parties
Claimant: Sahibzad Khan; First Defendant: Gulab Mohammed; Second Defendant: Pir Mohammed
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Beneficial Ownership, Partnership Dissolution, Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Fiduciary Duty, Disclosure Obligations
Property Law Partnership Law Equity Beneficial Ownership Partnership Dissolution Constructive Trust Resulting Trust Fiduciary Duty +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sahibzad Khan

Claimant

Gulab Mohammed

First Defendant

Pir Mohammed

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a partnership existed between the claimant and first defendant and its duration
  2. 2 Whether the property was purchased as a partnership asset or by the defendants separately
  3. 3 Whether the second defendant has a beneficial interest in the property

Ratio Decidendi

The property was acquired by the first defendant for the partnership with the claimant, and the first defendant breached fiduciary duties by excluding the claimant. The second defendant's beneficial interest arises from a dishonest arrangement and ranks after the claimant's partnership interest. The property is held in trust for the partnership, and the first defendant's share is held on further trust for the second defendant.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Declaration that the property is a partnership asset held in trust for the claimant and first defendant as partners
  • Declaration that all payments towards purchase and receipts from the second defendant are partnership funds