Gaspar v Zaleski & Ors
The 2008 Trust Deed confers a beneficial interest on Isabelle Gaspar as tenant in common, entitling her to £225,000 and one quarter of the profit after mortgage repayment and Mark's contribution. There was no agreement requiring Isabelle to reimburse Mark, and no subsequent proprietary estoppel or constructive trust altered her interest.
- Parties
- Claimant: Isabelle Josephine Erika Gaspar; First Defendant: Mark Xavier Zaleski; Second Defendant: Mido Kabbani; Third Defendant: Antonina Dominique Kabbani
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Ownership, Declaration of Trust, Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Order for Sale, Equitable Accounting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isabelle Josephine Erika Gaspar
Claimant
Mark Xavier Zaleski
First Defendant
Mido Kabbani
Second Defendant
Antonina Dominique Kabbani
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2008 Trust Deed confers a beneficial interest on Isabelle Gaspar
- 2 Whether a prior agreement between Mark and Isabelle affects beneficial ownership
- 3 Whether beneficial ownership changed in 2009 due to proprietary estoppel
Ratio Decidendi
The 2008 Trust Deed confers a beneficial interest on Isabelle Gaspar as tenant in common, entitling her to £225,000 and one quarter of the profit after mortgage repayment and Mark's contribution. There was no agreement requiring Isabelle to reimburse Mark, and no subsequent proprietary estoppel or constructive trust altered her interest.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaration that Isabelle Gaspar has a beneficial interest in the Property as tenant in common
- Order for sale of the Property
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment