Hassan v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust & Ors

Hassan v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust & Ors

There was no arguable merit in any of the grounds advanced by the applicant; allegations of bias were wholly unsubstantiated, and all case management decisions were within the discretion of the tribunal and not erroneous in law.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Hassan; Defendant/respondent: Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust and Others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Applications for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Bias, Case Management, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Right to Fair Trial
Employment Law Civil Procedure Bias Case Management Unfair Dismissal Race Discrimination Right to Fair Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan

Claimant/appellant

Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust and Others

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal were biased or lacked impartiality
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to add respondents and amend claims was proper
  3. 3 Whether case management directions and deposit order were lawful

Ratio Decidendi

There was no arguable merit in any of the grounds advanced by the applicant; allegations of bias were wholly unsubstantiated, and all case management decisions were within the discretion of the tribunal and not erroneous in law.

Court Disposition

Applications for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Applications refused
  • Appellant to be supplied copy of transcript of judgment at public expense