Elizabeth Condron v National Assembly for Wales & Anor
The appearance of bias due to possible pre-determination by the Chair of the Planning Decision Committee rendered the grant of planning permission unlawful; the decision must be quashed to ensure impartial reconsideration.
- Parties
- Claimant: Elizabeth Condron; First Defendant: National Assembly for Wales; Second Defendant: Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; planning permission quashed
- Legal Topics
- Bias in Decision Making, Environmental Impact Assessment, Planning Permission, Buffer Zones, Delegation of Functions, Post Inquiry Submissions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Condron
Claimant
National Assembly for Wales
First Defendant
Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Planning Decision Committee's grant of planning permission was vitiated by bias or possible pre-determination
- 2 Whether failure to consider post-inquiry submissions and environmental information rendered the decision unlawful
- 3 Whether the Planning Decision Committee failed to consider material considerations such as buffer zones, cumulative effects, and undisclosed landfill sites
Ratio Decidendi
The appearance of bias due to possible pre-determination by the Chair of the Planning Decision Committee rendered the grant of planning permission unlawful; the decision must be quashed to ensure impartial reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; planning permission quashed
Orders
- Planning permission granted on 11th April 2005 is set aside
- Matter to be reconsidered afresh free from the appearance of bias
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment