Caresse Navigation Ltd v Zurich Assurances Maroc & Ors
The bill of lading, by specific reference to the 'law and arbitration clause' of the charterparty, incorporated the English law and exclusive jurisdiction clause, justifying the anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings in Morocco.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Caresse Navigation Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Zurich Assurances MAROC; Defendant/appellant: WAFA Assurance; Defendant/appellant: AXA Assurance MAROC; Defendant/appellant: Atlanta
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Interim Anti Suit Injunction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bills of Lading, Charterparty Incorporation, Jurisdiction Clauses, Anti Suit Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caresse Navigation Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Zurich Assurances MAROC
Defendant/appellant
WAFA Assurance
Defendant/appellant
AXA Assurance MAROC
Defendant/appellant
Atlanta
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Interim Anti Suit Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bill of lading incorporated the English law and exclusive jurisdiction clause from the charterparty
- 2 Whether an anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings in Morocco was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The bill of lading, by specific reference to the 'law and arbitration clause' of the charterparty, incorporated the English law and exclusive jurisdiction clause, justifying the anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings in Morocco.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Anti-suit injunction upheld restraining cargo interests from pursuing proceedings in Morocco
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment