WA (Palestinian Territories), R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 12 (13 January 2021)

WA (Palestinian Territories), R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 12 (13 January 2021)

The Home Secretary is not obliged under Article 2 or Article 8 ECHR to amend WA's BRP to reflect the claimed date of birth, as the claimed date is unsupported by evidence and outside the assessed range; operational duties under Article 2 fall on the NHS, not the Home Secretary, and Article 8 does not require insertion of inaccurate information in official records.

Citation
[2021] EWCA Civ 12
Parties
Claimant/appellant: WA (Palestinian Territories); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervener: Mind
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Biometric Residence Permit, Age Assessment, Article 2 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Operational Duty, Identity Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WA (Palestinian Territories)

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Mind

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)

  1. 1 Whether the Home Secretary is obliged to amend WA's date of birth on his BRP to the claimed date under Article 2 and Article 8 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the Judge should have determined WA's true date of birth
  3. 3 Whether Article 2 ECHR imposes a positive operational duty on the Home Secretary in these circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The Home Secretary is not obliged under Article 2 or Article 8 ECHR to amend WA's BRP to reflect the claimed date of birth, as the claimed date is unsupported by evidence and outside the assessed range; operational duties under Article 2 fall on the NHS, not the Home Secretary, and Article 8 does not require insertion of inaccurate information in official records.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No amendment to WA's BRP
  • Anonymity direction maintained