WA (Palestinian Territories), R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 12 (13 January 2021)
The Home Secretary is not obliged under Article 2 or Article 8 ECHR to amend WA's BRP to reflect the claimed date of birth, as the claimed date is unsupported by evidence and outside the assessed range; operational duties under Article 2 fall on the NHS, not the Home Secretary, and Article 8 does not require insertion of inaccurate information in official records.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Civ 12
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: WA (Palestinian Territories); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervener: Mind
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Biometric Residence Permit, Age Assessment, Article 2 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Operational Duty, Identity Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WA (Palestinian Territories)
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Mind
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Home Secretary is obliged to amend WA's date of birth on his BRP to the claimed date under Article 2 and Article 8 ECHR
- 2 Whether the Judge should have determined WA's true date of birth
- 3 Whether Article 2 ECHR imposes a positive operational duty on the Home Secretary in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The Home Secretary is not obliged under Article 2 or Article 8 ECHR to amend WA's BRP to reflect the claimed date of birth, as the claimed date is unsupported by evidence and outside the assessed range; operational duties under Article 2 fall on the NHS, not the Home Secretary, and Article 8 does not require insertion of inaccurate information in official records.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No amendment to WA's BRP
- Anonymity direction maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment