Morais & Ors v Ryanair DAC [2025] EWCA Civ 19 (17 January 2025)
The Blacklisting Regulations prohibit blacklisting for participation in industrial action organised or endorsed by a trade union, and do not require compliance with Part V of the 1992 Act for protection. Ryanair's attempt to relitigate the lawfulness of the strike ballot constitutes an abuse of process.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 19
- Parties
- Claimants (respondents to the Appeal): Benjamin Morais & Others; Appellants: Ryanair DAC; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Blacklisting, Trade Union Activities, Industrial Action, Detriment, Interpretation of Regulations, Article 11 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Morais & Others
Claimants (respondents to the Appeal)
Ryanair DAC
Appellants
Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether participation in industrial action is included in 'activities of trade unions' under the Blacklisting Regulations
- 2 Whether the Blacklisting Regulations require compliance with Part V of the 1992 Act for protection
- 3 Whether Ryanair is estopped or barred from contesting the lawfulness of the strike ballot
Ratio Decidendi
The Blacklisting Regulations prohibit blacklisting for participation in industrial action organised or endorsed by a trade union, and do not require compliance with Part V of the 1992 Act for protection. Ryanair's attempt to relitigate the lawfulness of the strike ballot constitutes an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claim under s 146 dismissed by consent
- Claims under Blacklisting Regulations upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment