Bradley & Anor v Heslin & Anor
Bradleys were the successful party as they established ownership of the gates and pillars and secured a declaration of their right to close the gates, though not to the full extent claimed. Injunctive relief was denied as circumstances did not warrant it. Costs were awarded at 50% to reflect partial success and genuine attempts at settlement.
- Parties
- Claimants: Bradley & Anor; Defendants: Heslin & Anor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Bradleys declared owners of gates and pillars and entitled to close gates; no injunction granted; Heslins to pay 50% of Bradleys' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Dispute, Ownership of Gates and Pillars, Right to Close Gates, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bradley & Anor
Claimants
Heslin & Anor
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bradleys have a right to close the gates
- 2 Ownership of the gates and pillars
- 3 Appropriateness of injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
Bradleys were the successful party as they established ownership of the gates and pillars and secured a declaration of their right to close the gates, though not to the full extent claimed. Injunctive relief was denied as circumstances did not warrant it. Costs were awarded at 50% to reflect partial success and genuine attempts at settlement.
Court Disposition
Bradleys declared owners of gates and pillars and entitled to close gates; no injunction granted; Heslins to pay 50% of Bradleys' costs.
Orders
- Declaration in terms of paragraph 4 of draft order without additional qualifications.
- Recital that defendants will not seek to lock gates open or obstruct normal operation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment