Bradley & Anor v Heslin & Anor

Bradley & Anor v Heslin & Anor

Bradleys were the successful party as they established ownership of the gates and pillars and secured a declaration of their right to close the gates, though not to the full extent claimed. Injunctive relief was denied as circumstances did not warrant it. Costs were awarded at 50% to reflect partial success and genuine attempts at settlement.

Parties
Claimants: Bradley & Anor; Defendants: Heslin & Anor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Bradleys declared owners of gates and pillars and entitled to close gates; no injunction granted; Heslins to pay 50% of Bradleys' costs.
Legal Topics
Boundary Dispute, Ownership of Gates and Pillars, Right to Close Gates, Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bradley & Anor

Claimants

Heslin & Anor

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Bradleys have a right to close the gates
  2. 2 Ownership of the gates and pillars
  3. 3 Appropriateness of injunctive relief

Ratio Decidendi

Bradleys were the successful party as they established ownership of the gates and pillars and secured a declaration of their right to close the gates, though not to the full extent claimed. Injunctive relief was denied as circumstances did not warrant it. Costs were awarded at 50% to reflect partial success and genuine attempts at settlement.

Court Disposition

Bradleys declared owners of gates and pillars and entitled to close gates; no injunction granted; Heslins to pay 50% of Bradleys' costs.

Orders

  • Declaration in terms of paragraph 4 of draft order without additional qualifications.
  • Recital that defendants will not seek to lock gates open or obstruct normal operation.