Seeckts v Derwent & Anor

Seeckts v Derwent & Anor

The T-marks on the conveyance plan indicate that the boundary features, including the laurel hedge, belonged to Clock House. The dimensions on the plan provide only a general indication and do not override the implication of the T-marks. The Judge was correct in finding for Mr Seeckts regarding ownership of the hedge, but was not entitled to order precise fixing of the boundary without agreement of the parties.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Robert Cecil Seeckts; Defendant/appellant: Paul Derwent; Defendant/appellant: Janet Derwent
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except as to the order for precise fixing of the boundary, which is omitted.
Legal Topics
Boundary Disputes, Interpretation of Conveyance, Ownership of Boundary Features
Property Law Boundary Disputes Interpretation of Conveyance Ownership of Boundary Features

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Cecil Seeckts

Claimant/respondent

Paul Derwent

Defendant/appellant

Janet Derwent

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Correct interpretation of the 1968 conveyance and plan regarding the disputed boundary
  2. 2 Ownership of the laurel hedge and other boundary features between the properties
  3. 3 Effect of T-marks and dimensions on the conveyance plan

Ratio Decidendi

The T-marks on the conveyance plan indicate that the boundary features, including the laurel hedge, belonged to Clock House. The dimensions on the plan provide only a general indication and do not override the implication of the T-marks. The Judge was correct in finding for Mr Seeckts regarding ownership of the hedge, but was not entitled to order precise fixing of the boundary without agreement of the parties.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except as to the order for precise fixing of the boundary, which is omitted.

Orders

  • Declaration that the claimant is the owner of the boundary features including hedges, trees, fences, and walls surrounding Clock House, specifically the land upon which the laurel hedge grew between points A-B-C-D on the claim plan.
  • Damages awarded in the sum of £1500.