Gillon v Baxter & Anor [2003] EWCA Civ 1591 (10 October 2003)
Where a transfer plan is too small in scale and imprecise to delineate the boundary, the court must look to the physical features on the ground at the time of the transfer to determine the parties' intentions; in this case, the fence line E to F was the intended boundary.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1591
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Robin Walter Browning Gillon; Defendant/respondent: John David Baxter; Defendant/respondent: Lucille Baxter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Boundary Dispute
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Construction of Conveyances, Interpretation of Plans, Easements and Rights of Way, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robin Walter Browning Gillon
Claimant/appellant
John David Baxter
Defendant/respondent
Lucille Baxter
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Boundary Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 Where is the legal boundary between Sidbrook Farm and Lower Knapp Farm according to the 1985 transfer?
- 2 How should a boundary be determined when the transfer plan is imprecise?
Ratio Decidendi
Where a transfer plan is too small in scale and imprecise to delineate the boundary, the court must look to the physical features on the ground at the time of the transfer to determine the parties' intentions; in this case, the fence line E to F was the intended boundary.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed with costs to be subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment