Clements & Ors v Goodacre
The appeal was dismissed because the 1973 boundary agreement (Lewis boundary) defined the true boundary, the wedge was included in the land transferred to the claimants, and there was no evidence of intention to reserve the wedge for access. Registered boundaries were not definitive, and no issue estoppel or easement of necessity applied.
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Edward John Clements & Barbara Clements; Claimants/respondents: John Kendall Bush & Catriona Mary Bush; Defendant/appellant: Brian Vincent Goodacre
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Brighton County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Title to Land, Issue Estoppel, Easement of Necessity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward John Clements & Barbara Clements
Claimants/respondents
John Kendall Bush & Catriona Mary Bush
Claimants/respondents
Brian Vincent Goodacre
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Brighton County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disputed 'wedge' of land belonged to the claimants or the appellant
- 2 Whether issue estoppel arising from previous proceedings barred the claimants' action
- 3 Whether an easement of necessity existed over the wedge
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the 1973 boundary agreement (Lewis boundary) defined the true boundary, the wedge was included in the land transferred to the claimants, and there was no evidence of intention to reserve the wedge for access. Registered boundaries were not definitive, and no issue estoppel or easement of necessity applied.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Application to amend statement of case refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment