Kennerley v Beech & Anor
The southern boundary of Old Westwick is the centre line of the hedge at the top of the bank, not the rope-edged path. The right of way over the wiggly path was not a valid easement as it did not accommodate the dominant tenement and was a personal right for the benefit of a tenant, not the landowner.
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: John William Frank Kennerley; Claimant/respondent: Eric Edward Beech; Claimant/respondent: Jill Paula Beech
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Disputes, Easements, Adverse Possession, Interpretation of Conveyances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John William Frank Kennerley
Defendant/appellant
Eric Edward Beech
Claimant/respondent
Jill Paula Beech
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Location of the southern boundary of Old Westwick
- 2 Existence and validity of a right of way over the wiggly path
Ratio Decidendi
The southern boundary of Old Westwick is the centre line of the hedge at the top of the bank, not the rope-edged path. The right of way over the wiggly path was not a valid easement as it did not accommodate the dominant tenement and was a personal right for the benefit of a tenant, not the landowner.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Southern boundary of Old Westwick fixed at the centre of the hedge at the top of the bank
- No enforceable right of way exists over the wiggly path
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment