British Sugar Plc v Cegelec Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1450 (07 October 2004)

British Sugar Plc v Cegelec Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1450 (07 October 2004)

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to exclude the late expert evidence of Mr Regan, given the defendant's failure to adduce it at the appropriate time and the prejudice to the claimant if admitted. The judge's findings on causation—that the failure was due to migration of the end windings and not the heat sink fins—were justified on the evidence. The appeal was dismissed as there was no error in the judge's approach or findings.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Civ 1450
Parties
Claimant/respondent: British Sugar PLC; Defendant/appellant: Cegelec Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 October 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Negligence, Expert Evidence, Case Management, Consequential Loss
Contract Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Breach of Contract Negligence Expert Evidence Case Management Consequential Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Sugar PLC

Claimant/respondent

Cegelec Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in excluding the defendant's late expert evidence (Mr Regan) on the cause of generator failure
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge's findings on causation and liability were justified on the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to exclude the late expert evidence of Mr Regan, given the defendant's failure to adduce it at the appropriate time and the prejudice to the claimant if admitted. The judge's findings on causation—that the failure was due to migration of the end windings and not the heat sink fins—were justified on the evidence. The appeal was dismissed as there was no error in the judge's approach or findings.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; judgment for the claimant/respondent stands