Medina Housing Association Ltd v Connolly [2002] EWCA Civ 1263 (26 July 2002)
Procedural irregularities in the committal process did not cause injustice or an unfair trial to the appellant; the injunction was in force on the date of the breach; and the sentence imposed was within the permissible range and not manifestly excessive.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1263
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Medina Housing Association Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Andrew Neil Connolly
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Newport County Court Order Committing Appellant for Breach of Injunction and Contempt
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunction, Committal for Contempt, Procedural Fairness, Interpretation of Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Medina Housing Association Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Andrew Neil Connolly
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Newport County Court Order Committing Appellant for Breach of Injunction and Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether procedural defects in committal proceedings invalidated the order
- 2 Whether the injunction was in force at the time of the alleged breach
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
Procedural irregularities in the committal process did not cause injustice or an unfair trial to the appellant; the injunction was in force on the date of the breach; and the sentence imposed was within the permissible range and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs, not to be enforced without the permission of the Court.
- Public funding assessment of the Appellant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment