Forester Maurice Labrouche v Frey & Ors [2016] EWHC 268 (Ch) (18 February 2016)
The assets of Newin Foundation and its subsidiaries are not held on trust for Olga's Will Trustees; distributions to Soledad were not excessive and were properly accounted; Markus and Hugo's remuneration was authorised and reasonable; no undisclosed retrocessions were received; division of Plum Bay House proceeds did not breach trust; Forester not entitled to costs for removal of Markus; conversion of Newin Establishment to Newin Foundation was not a breach of trust.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 268 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Forester Maurice Labrouche; 1st Defendant: Markus Albert Frey; 2nd Defendant: The Estate of Hugo Albert Frey; 3rd Defendant: Soledad Cabeza de Vaca y Leighton; 4th Defendant: Newin Foundation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Trust Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Trustee Remuneration, Trust Asset Distribution, Fiduciary Duties, Res Judicata, Liechtenstein Foundation Law, Swiss Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Forester Maurice Labrouche
Claimant
Markus Albert Frey
1st Defendant
The Estate of Hugo Albert Frey
2nd Defendant
Soledad Cabeza de Vaca y Leighton
3rd Defendant
Newin Foundation
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Trust Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assets of Newin Foundation and its subsidiaries are held on trust for Olga's Will Trustees
- 2 Whether distributions to Soledad breached trust by overpayment and improper accounting
- 3 Whether Markus and Hugo received unauthorised trustee remuneration
Ratio Decidendi
The assets of Newin Foundation and its subsidiaries are not held on trust for Olga's Will Trustees; distributions to Soledad were not excessive and were properly accounted; Markus and Hugo's remuneration was authorised and reasonable; no undisclosed retrocessions were received; division of Plum Bay House proceeds did not breach trust; Forester not entitled to costs for removal of Markus; conversion of Newin Establishment to Newin Foundation was not a breach of trust.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- No relief granted to claimant
- Counterclaim for trustee remuneration allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment