Sheffield v Sheffield & Ors
Defaulting trustees must pay the costs of accounts and inquiries ordered as a result of breach of trust, regardless of whether sums are found payable, because the beneficiary's primary right is to information and accurate accounting. Offers made without full disclosure do not justify depriving the beneficiary of costs. Partial success and conduct may justify proportionate discounts, but the claimant remains the successful party overall.
- Parties
- Claimant: John David Sheffield; First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield, as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement, and in Personal Capacity): John Julian Lionel George Sheffield; First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield): Lionel Julian Sheffield; First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield, as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement): Simon Robert Alexander Sheffield; Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement): Fergus Hugh Sterling Graham; Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement): Nicola Elizabeth Anne Graham; Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement): John Frank Ratcliffe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs order granted in favour of claimant, subject to proportionate discounts.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Accounts and Inquiries, Costs Orders, Trustee Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John David Sheffield
Claimant
John Julian Lionel George Sheffield
First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield, as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement, and in Personal Capacity)
Lionel Julian Sheffield
First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield)
Simon Robert Alexander Sheffield
First Defendant (as Executor of John Vincent Sheffield, as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement)
Fergus Hugh Sterling Graham
Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement)
Nicola Elizabeth Anne Graham
Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement)
John Frank Ratcliffe
Third Defendant (as Trustee of the 1968 Settlement)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of accounts and inquiries ordered following breach of trust and settlement?
- 2 Does partial success or offers of settlement affect costs liability?
- 3 Are special principles applicable to costs in trust litigation?
Ratio Decidendi
Defaulting trustees must pay the costs of accounts and inquiries ordered as a result of breach of trust, regardless of whether sums are found payable, because the beneficiary's primary right is to information and accurate accounting. Offers made without full disclosure do not justify depriving the beneficiary of costs. Partial success and conduct may justify proportionate discounts, but the claimant remains the successful party overall.
Court Disposition
Costs order granted in favour of claimant, subject to proportionate discounts.
Orders
- The executors shall pay 90% of the claimant’s costs of the accounts and inquiries pursuant to §§2 and 4 of the Main Order, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Julian personally shall pay 97% of the claimant’s costs of the accounts and inquiries pursuant to §§5 to 7 of the Main Order, to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment