Harrods Ltd. v Times Newspaper Ltd. & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 294 (22 February 2006)

Harrods Ltd. v Times Newspaper Ltd. & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 294 (22 February 2006)

Disclosure of documents in support of a public interest defence in breach of confidence proceedings must be limited to those relevant to the specific confidential information alleged to have been published, and not to a general inquiry into the claimant's employment practices. The public interest defence is not confined to what was known at the time of publication, but the scope of disclosure must be tied to the relief sought and the issues defined by the pleadings. Where the claimant undertakes not to require proof of the general thesis at trial, disclosure should be limited accordingly.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Civ 294
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Harrods Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Times Newspaper Ltd & Ors
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Interlocutory Order in Breach of Confidence Proceedings / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Decision on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Breach of Confidence, Public Interest Defence, Disclosure of Documents, Employment Practices, Injunctions
Civil Procedure Media Law Equity Breach of Confidence Public Interest Defence Disclosure of Documents Employment Practices Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harrods Ltd

Claimant/appellant

Times Newspaper Ltd & Ors

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Interlocutory Order in Breach of Confidence Proceedings / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Decision on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a defendant in a breach of confidence action can rely on information not known at the time of publication to support a public interest defence
  2. 2 Whether disclosure of documents relating to employment terminations is relevant to the pleaded defences
  3. 3 Whether the truth or falsity of the general thesis about the claimant's employment practices is a material issue

Ratio Decidendi

Disclosure of documents in support of a public interest defence in breach of confidence proceedings must be limited to those relevant to the specific confidential information alleged to have been published, and not to a general inquiry into the claimant's employment practices. The public interest defence is not confined to what was known at the time of publication, but the scope of disclosure must be tied to the relief sought and the issues defined by the pleadings. Where the claimant undertakes not to require proof of the general thesis at trial, disclosure should be limited accordingly.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of 23 January 2006 varied to restrict disclosure to documents relating to Mr Simonin and Mr Decouvelaere only.