Imerman v Tchenguiz & Ors [2009] EWHC 2024 (QB) (27 July 2009)
The claimant is entitled to summary injunctive relief restraining the defendants from retaining, using, or disclosing the confidential information taken from his computer system, as the defendants have no lawful right to retain or use the information and no public interest or Article 6 justification has been established for continued retention. The nature of the information and its source justify the relief, irrespective of how it was obtained.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2024
- Parties
- Claimant: Vivian Imerman; First Defendant: Robert Tchenguiz; Second Defendant: Vincent Tchenguiz; Third Defendant: Tim McClean; Fourth Defendant: Nouri Obayda; Fifth Defendant: Sarosh Zaiwalla
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for limited injunctive relief.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Confidence, Misuse of Private Information, Data Protection, Injunctive Relief, Summary Judgment, Computer Misuse, Legal Professional Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vivian Imerman
Claimant
Robert Tchenguiz
First Defendant
Vincent Tchenguiz
Second Defendant
Tim McClean
Third Defendant
Nouri Obayda
Fourth Defendant
Sarosh Zaiwalla
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants had any lawful right to retain or use confidential information taken from the claimant's computer system
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted for injunctive relief restraining use or disclosure of the information
- 3 Whether the information is confidential and/or protected by privacy rights
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to summary injunctive relief restraining the defendants from retaining, using, or disclosing the confidential information taken from his computer system, as the defendants have no lawful right to retain or use the information and no public interest or Article 6 justification has been established for continued retention. The nature of the information and its source justify the relief, irrespective of how it was obtained.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for limited injunctive relief.
Orders
- Prohibitory injunctions against all defendants restraining communication, disclosure, copying, or use of the specified categories of documents or information.
- Defendants to return or deliver up all such information in their possession or control.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment