British Broadcasting Corporation v Harpercollins Publishers Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch) (04 October 2010)
The identity of Ben Collins as 'The Stig' was, by the time of the hearing, so generally accessible through widespread press coverage that it had lost its confidential character. As the information was no longer confidential, neither contractual nor equitable duties prevented its publication, and the BBC was not likely to succeed at trial in restraining publication. Therefore, no interim injunction should be granted.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: British Broadcasting Corporation; First Defendant: HarperCollins Publishers Limited; Second Defendant: Ben Collins; Third Defendant: Collins Autosport Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Injunction Application / High Court (chancery Division) Decision on Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Interim injunction refused
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Confidence, Interim Injunctions, Confidential Information, Public Domain, Contractual Obligations, Equitable Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Broadcasting Corporation
Claimant
HarperCollins Publishers Limited
First Defendant
Ben Collins
Second Defendant
Collins Autosport Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application / High Court (chancery Division) Decision on Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the identity of 'The Stig' is confidential information as of the hearing date
- 2 Whether the defendants are under a contractual or equitable duty not to disclose the identity
- 3 Whether an interim injunction should be granted to restrain publication of Ben Collins' autobiography revealing his identity as 'The Stig'
Ratio Decidendi
The identity of Ben Collins as 'The Stig' was, by the time of the hearing, so generally accessible through widespread press coverage that it had lost its confidential character. As the information was no longer confidential, neither contractual nor equitable duties prevented its publication, and the BBC was not likely to succeed at trial in restraining publication. Therefore, no interim injunction should be granted.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction refused
Orders
- No interim injunction granted against any defendant
- No general injunction granted to restrain disclosure of other confidential matters
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment