XXX v Persons Unknown [2022] EWHC 2776 (KB) (25 October 2022)

XXX v Persons Unknown [2022] EWHC 2776 (KB) (25 October 2022)

The claimant is entitled to summary judgment for a permanent injunction for breach of confidence because the evidence shows the defendants stole and threatened to disclose confidential, security-sensitive information, and there is no real prospect of a defence. Anonymity is justified due to the risk of harm from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 2776 (KB)
Parties
Claimant: XXX; Defendants: Persons Unknown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Breach of Confidence (ransomware) / Summary Judgment Application (final Injunction)
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for permanent injunction; anonymity order continued; damages and costs adjourned with liberty to restore.
Legal Topics
Breach of Confidence, Ransomware, Permanent Injunction, Anonymity Orders, Open Justice, Reporting Restrictions
Civil Procedure Confidentiality Information Technology Law Breach of Confidence Ransomware Permanent Injunction Anonymity Orders Open Justice +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXX

Claimant

Persons Unknown

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil Breach of Confidence (ransomware) / Summary Judgment Application (final Injunction)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to summary judgment for a permanent injunction for breach of confidence following a ransomware attack
  2. 2 Whether anonymity for the claimant should be continued
  3. 3 Whether the summary judgment hearing should be held in private

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to summary judgment for a permanent injunction for breach of confidence because the evidence shows the defendants stole and threatened to disclose confidential, security-sensitive information, and there is no real prospect of a defence. Anonymity is justified due to the risk of harm from disclosure of the claimant's identity, given the nature of the information and the potential for exploitation by malicious actors. The hearing for summary judgment should be public, but the claimant's identity must remain anonymised.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for permanent injunction; anonymity order continued; damages and costs adjourned with liberty to restore.

Orders

  • Permanent injunction restraining defendants from using or distributing claimant's confidential information
  • Order for return or destruction of stolen information upon oath