Filobake Ltd v Rondo Ltd & Anor [2004] EWHC 695 (TCC) (21 April 2004)

Filobake Ltd v Rondo Ltd & Anor [2004] EWHC 695 (TCC) (21 April 2004)

The court found that Filobake failed to establish that the equipment supplied by Rondo and Frampton was unfit for purpose or breached performance guarantees. The evidence showed that the equipment could produce samosa pastry when operated with appropriate recipes and procedures. Difficulties experienced by Filobake were attributable to operational choices and not to defects in the supplied equipment. Accordingly, there was no breach of contract or duty of care by Rondo or Frampton.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 695 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Filobake Limited; First Defendant: Rondo Limited; Second Defendant: Frampton International Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Performance Guarantees, Sale of Goods, Damages, Equipment Supply, Product Fitness
Contract Law Commercial Law Product Liability Breach of Contract Performance Guarantees Sale of Goods Damages Equipment Supply +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Filobake Limited

Claimant

Rondo Limited

First Defendant

Frampton International Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Rondo and Frampton breached their respective contracts with Filobake by supplying equipment unfit for purpose
  2. 2 Whether Rondo owed and breached a duty of care to Filobake
  3. 3 Whether Filobake was entitled to reject the equipment and claim damages

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Filobake failed to establish that the equipment supplied by Rondo and Frampton was unfit for purpose or breached performance guarantees. The evidence showed that the equipment could produce samosa pastry when operated with appropriate recipes and procedures. Difficulties experienced by Filobake were attributable to operational choices and not to defects in the supplied equipment. Accordingly, there was no breach of contract or duty of care by Rondo or Frampton.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for damages and return of purchase price rejected
  • No order as to costs beyond standard provisions