Medsted Associates Ltd v Canaccord Genuity Wealth (International) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 83 (06 February 2019)
Medsted was not under a duty to disclose the exact amount of commission received from Collins Stewart to its clients; therefore, Medsted did not breach fiduciary duty and public policy does not bar damages for Collins Stewart's breach of contract. Damages should be assessed.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Civ 83
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Medsted Associates Limited; Respondent/defendant: Canaccord Genuity Wealth (International) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (commercial Court) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; damages to be assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Non Circumvention Agreement, Secret Commissions, Fiduciary Duties, Damages Assessment, Public Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Medsted Associates Limited
Appellant/claimant
Canaccord Genuity Wealth (International) Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (commercial Court) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Medsted owed fiduciary duties to introduced clients
- 2 Whether Medsted breached fiduciary duties by failing to disclose commission split
- 3 Whether public policy bars damages for breach of contract due to alleged secret commissions
Ratio Decidendi
Medsted was not under a duty to disclose the exact amount of commission received from Collins Stewart to its clients; therefore, Medsted did not breach fiduciary duty and public policy does not bar damages for Collins Stewart's breach of contract. Damages should be assessed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; damages to be assessed.
Orders
- Judgment for Claimant on liability; damages to be assessed for trading with specified clients.
- Defendant to pay 75% of Claimant's costs of liability proceedings, assessed on standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment