Bradley v Jockey Club

Bradley v Jockey Club

The penalty imposed by the Jockey Club, as reduced by the Appeal Board, was proportionate and lawful. The court's role is supervisory and not to substitute its own judgment for that of the disciplinary body. The appeal was hopeless and must be dismissed.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Graham Bradley; Respondent/defendant: The Jockey Club
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dismissing Claim for Injunction and Damages for Breach of Contract
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Restraint of Trade, Proportionality of Penalty, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Disciplinary Proceedings
Contract Law Sports Law Judicial Review Breach of Contract Restraint of Trade Proportionality of Penalty Supervisory Jurisdiction Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham Bradley

Appellant/claimant

The Jockey Club

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Dismissing Claim for Injunction and Damages for Breach of Contract

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the penalty imposed by the Jockey Club was disproportionate and unlawful restraint of trade
  2. 2 Whether the court's role is supervisory or as a primary decision-maker in reviewing disciplinary penalties imposed by domestic bodies

Ratio Decidendi

The penalty imposed by the Jockey Club, as reduced by the Appeal Board, was proportionate and lawful. The court's role is supervisory and not to substitute its own judgment for that of the disciplinary body. The appeal was hopeless and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs awarded in favour of the respondent