BAE Systems Management Service (Two) Ltd & Anor v AS Enimex
None of the grounds advanced by Enimex had any prospect of success; the Registrar's findings and exercise of discretion were correct in law and fact, and the application to appeal was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: BAE Systems Management Services (Two) Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Trident Aviation Leasing Services (Jersey) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: AS Enimex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal With Appeal to Follow If Granted
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Damages Assessment, Mitigation of Loss, Interest on Damages, Lease Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BAE Systems Management Services (Two) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Trident Aviation Leasing Services (Jersey) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
AS Enimex
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal With Appeal to Follow If Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Registrar erred in rejecting the argument that damages should be reduced due to BAE's alleged complicity in the breach
- 2 Whether the Registrar erred in attaching little weight to late evidence from Enimex's witness
- 3 Whether the Registrar was wrong to hold that any claim by Enimex against BAE would be a counterclaim, not a defence
Ratio Decidendi
None of the grounds advanced by Enimex had any prospect of success; the Registrar's findings and exercise of discretion were correct in law and fact, and the application to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment