BHB Enterprises plc v Victor Chandler (International) Ltd
The PA/VCI agreement is conditional on VCI having a valid licence with BHB; PA is entitled to terminate supply if BHB so instructs. VCI's competition law pleading is defective as it does not properly allege unfair pricing, only high pricing, and ignores relevant market value and consumer impact. There is no viable cause of action against PA or BHB for breach of contract, procurement, or abuse of dominant position on the facts and pleadings as presented.
- Parties
- Claimant: BHB Enterprises plc; Defendant / Part 20 Claimant: Victor Chandler (International) Limited; Part 20 Claimant: Newcote Services Limited; Part 20 Defendant: PA News Limited; Part 20 Defendant: British Horseracing Board Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/contract/competition / Interlocutory Application for Amendment, Joinder, and Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Database Rights, Abuse of Dominant Position, Interim Injunctions, Procurement of Breach of Contract, Unlawful Interference With Trade
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BHB Enterprises plc
Claimant
Victor Chandler (International) Limited
Defendant / Part 20 Claimant
Newcote Services Limited
Part 20 Claimant
PA News Limited
Part 20 Defendant
British Horseracing Board Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contract/competition / Interlocutory Application for Amendment, Joinder, and Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PA News Limited can be joined as a Part 20 Defendant
- 2 Whether VCI can amend its pleadings to allege abuse of dominant position under Competition Act 1998 and Article 82 EC
- 3 Whether VCI is entitled to interim injunctive relief to prevent termination of Pre-Race Data feed
Ratio Decidendi
The PA/VCI agreement is conditional on VCI having a valid licence with BHB; PA is entitled to terminate supply if BHB so instructs. VCI's competition law pleading is defective as it does not properly allege unfair pricing, only high pricing, and ignores relevant market value and consumer impact. There is no viable cause of action against PA or BHB for breach of contract, procurement, or abuse of dominant position on the facts and pleadings as presented.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Refusal of permission to join PA News Limited as Part 20 Defendant
- Refusal of permission to amend pleadings to allege abuse of dominant position under Competition Act 1998 and Article 82 EC
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment